ReelMintreelmint
Side by side · live prices

Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.5

Both make 30-second clips with sound. Wan 3.0 costs noticeably less per second at every resolution; Seedance 2.5 is the stronger choice when dialogue, lip sync and a recurring cast matter. A common pattern is drafting on Wan and finishing the shot that matters on Seedance.

Price and limits

Wan 3.0Seedance 2.5
MakerAlibabaByteDance
Max clip length30 s30 s
Audionative, always onnative, optional
Image to videoyesyes
Billedper 10-second clipper 10-second clip
480p◉ 100 · $0.40◉ 351 · $1.40
720p◉ 200 · $0.80◉ 788 · $3.15
1080p◉ 400 · $1.60◉ 1,425 · $5.70

Per-second models are quoted at 10 s for Wan 3.0 and 10 s for Seedance 2.5; per-clip models at their fixed length. Read from the same rate table the Generate button uses. One credit is $0.004.

Pick Wan 3.0 when

  • Budget per second is the deciding factor.
  • You want many long b-roll or ambient shots.
  • You will feed up to ten stills and five clips as references.

Pick Seedance 2.5 when

  • Characters speak and the lips must match.
  • A recurring cast must look the same scene to scene.
  • You want ByteDance's current flagship.

Try both on free credits

Same prompt, both models, prices on the button. Free details: Wan 3.0 free · Seedance 2.5 free.

Start free

Other comparisons